The agreement covers a period of more than one year after an employee`s termination of employment; or it is well regulated that New York courts do not impose a non-compete clause if the former employee was fired for no reason. This is due to the fact that one of the essential aspects of the restrictions on a worker`s ability to change jobs is the employer`s persistent willingness to employ the party that agrees not to compete. That argument is based, in particular, on the unfairness of a scenario in which a worker against whom the non-competition clause must be applied has done nothing to obtain his dismissal. In this case, it`s best to consult with a New York non-compete lawyer to see what your options are. Each of these factors must be closely adapted to ensure that the non-competition is not broader than is necessary to protect the interests of the employer. The letter claimed that Es Russell-Kraft was banned from working for Reuters on the terms of its non-compete clause. Reuters decides, like many companies, to fire Russell-Kraft to avoid the potential conflict with Law360. The court refused to enforce the non-competition clause because the executive did not have any real trade secrets. The New York attorney general also sued Jimmy John`s for signing competition bans in New York. The workers signed agreements that prohibited them from working for rival sandwich makers within a two-mile radius of a Jimmy Johns store. .